About
The text here has no particular meaning. Is it just me, or do you feel that still life is not as well received as portraiture and is seen as a less prestigious genre in some ways? Still life paintings in medieval painting were also seen as less prestigious than historical or religious paintings. I think vanitas was one of the attempts to revive still-life paintings.Vanitas is a still-life painting that represents "an allegory of the emptiness of life," and was intended to evoke the transience of vanity in the viewer by placing a skull, a metaphor for man's mortality, a clock, a pipe, or rotting fruit among various still-life objects that signify abundance, etc. The genre was intended to evoke the transience of life, the emptiness of pleasure, and the certainty of death. The genre was intended to evoke in the viewer the transience of life, the emptiness of pleasure, and the certainty of death, and to evoke the content of the Old Testament's "words of Qohelet.
What you see in the picture is fact or fiction.
I'm very sorry you're reading this, but I'm not writing anything particularly meaningful here either. Moreover, all the pages have the same content. If I could, I would like to keep looking through the viewfinder and clicking the shutter. I want to take pictures slowly. I want to focus on the subject I want to take my time with manual focus, and I want to take care of that part of the picture, and I don't care about the rest.It is a proper English translation of the automatic translation. It may not even be the document I intended.
